2008R2 native backups are very bad. better to use 3d party for backup of 2008 servers
>>SQL databases are becoming a larger part of our operation. We are now scanning almost all documents into a document management database, our financial system uses an SQL database, and we're adding a water plant management database. Currently SQL backups are beiing done manually within each application. I've been reading about Volume Shadow Copy Sevices being utilized in order to backup SQL. My question is plain and simple, does MS Native backup fully backup SQL databases or do I need third party backup software (like Backupexec) with and SQL agent?
>>
you dont need 3rd party for this.
MSSQL has good comfigurable maintenance plan inside SQL management console. You can configure backups as you need. SQL DB shouldnt be stopped during backup (because VSS technology).
>>Last question involves SBS2003 server. Small Business Server must be the "root server" of the tree. Our SBS server is primarly used for exchange services. This server is aging but still works like a champ. I am considering "keeping it alive indefinately" by virtualizing" this machine and running it on a Server 2008R2 box. If I take this route, does MS Native backup properly and fully backup the exchange server?
SBS2003 can be run in virtual enviroment Hyper-V R2
It can continue use native backups from guest OS SBS2003 as before, you dont need to change it.
(or you can even backup VHD files, but for this you need to stop guest OS).
From your topic, i do not found, where you are planning to install 3 SQL instances. on Hyper-V it cant be used by license agreement. BTW I wound not recommend this because you can have perfomance problem (SQL and Exchange DB on the same HDDs)