OR, we are looking at a pair of Netapp FAS2020 loaded with 12 - 1TB hard drives. It's disappoint with the Netapp's that you lose so many spindles to the system. 3 drives lost to each controller only leaves 6 spindles for performance. Cache probably helps out a bit here though.
-- You don't have to lose that many drives. I would recommend a 2020 with a shelf (if possible). Put SAS in the main unit and half populate the shelf with SATA. My understanding is that you have two controllers in each, move the second controller's vol0 to the shelf and since you have active/active cluster that should be ok.
If the VMs are mostly application servers you will run de-deduplication and should get 40-75% deduplication on the VMs
So, which way do we go????? Netapp offers a lot of cool features like usable snapshots, replication between both facilities, CIFS shares to eliminate fileshare servers, however, it will cost us about 60K for both systems.
--CIFS will cost less since you don't have to buy windows licenses and get over 50% de-duplcation or more on most office data
The Netapp is more solid and will do NFS, FC, iSCSI as your needs grow. If you outgrow it you can make your head-unit a shelf off of a newer unit.
With NFS and VMware you will also have SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure for snapping your VMs (and not taking that much space to do so) If you snap on a Dell or most units you will need double the LUN requirements
With CIFS you can also do up to 255 snapshots giving insteneous restores for admins and users of previous data. Make sure you backup via NDMP all the volumes and you'll have it on tape as well.