Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Teaching iPhone app creation...Any advice?
toggle visibility of <div> in galleria.js
Modify desktop icon size via registry in Server 2008
Run Windows 2008 Server in virtual environment on Windows 7 PRO?
Exchange 2010 on a domain controller 2008 R2 for 2 users?
windows permissioning
Backup Exec 12.5 Job Running Extremely slow
watchguard firewall rejects some pdf attachments, but not others
PoM/Tank Macro for Priest
Need to get the ip subset of a city