Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Curl API , XML parsing problem ?
Capture Linkbutton click event in Master page from Content page
ESXi compatible hardware
Exchange 2007 - Delivery is delayed to these recipients or distribution lists:
C++ permutation with replacement algorithm
Replace line from keyword
publishing websites in TMG 2010
How to fix windows xp service pack 3 install error: "The system cannot find the file specified"
Displaying GroupWise contacts in Exchange address book?
How to request previous month's records in my sql's where clause?