Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Sql Subquires
How to change HEX value to EBCDIC char
are there any inherent issues introducing a server 2008 system into a predominantly 2003 network?
Jumbo frame configuration is saved where?
adding a mac to sbs 2003 network
Connect to customer's pc using free utils
laptop setup win 7 64bit with 32bit xp pro emulator
How to Installing SQL-DMO on sql 2008
Can we split name in HTML
Return a value if date field is equal to the present date.