Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Lotus Agent to save attachment
Server 2008 NLB problem
Returning 0 from a template member function when instantiated with aggregate types
How do I read an unsigned character in C#?
SBS 2008 strange issue
Ampersand in Web.Config appSettings
Replacing SAN-added UCC SSL Cert
Why don't Lotus Notes document links work when sent to MS Outlook emails.
Vb 2008 and Microsoft.Office.Interop.E
xcel error
why avoid system tables?