Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Automatically do a release build
Paging with Entity Framework
Can't boot SBS 2008 Standard - CRCDISK.SYS
Er diagram for university accommodation office
Pass recordset from local sql server to remote sql server using access adp
navigation bumps down in ie
reading multiple integers from line stored in a file c++
error installing ajaxcontroltoolkit - 'there was an error loading types or assembly...'
Is this html markup flexible enough to accomodate various designs?
Access - SQL user parameter entry