Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Issuie Identifying XML feed issue
Outlook 2007 - Auto Create Distribution List
How to Protect a Client connection to remote SQL Server Database
XSLT Wildcards and custom processing.
fiddling nose habit
Advise on anti-spam measures
ZFS Fuse help Ubuntu 10.0.4 LTS
xp sp2 clients wont log or ping server 2003
I have a coolmax eSATA drive enclosure with a seagate SATA drive
Settings up vsftpd and ssl?