Microsoft
Software
Hardware
Network
Question : RAID Volume Performance
I have a new HP Proliant server, Win2K3 R2, with an on board RAID controller. I initially setup the OS and a Temp disk as one RAID 1+0 volume of 6 - 72 GB 15K SAS drives with 2 partitions. Thinking that the more spindles I have the faster overall performance.
Then I looked more into partition offset on RAID volumes and the performance loss inherent in misaligned partitions.
Is it better to have the OS on a RAID 1 set of the 72 GB drives for the OS which unfortunately has to be misaligned and create a 1+0 set of the remaining 4, 72 GB disks? I need to maximize I/Os on the non-OS partition.
Thanks in advance,
Wade
Answer : RAID Volume Performance
try this instead:
dsquery computer -o rdn -limit 0 |find "POSWR22" /i
Random Solutions
Sharepoint 2010 - Manage Content & Structure ...Where is it?
Editing the Windows Message "Your Account has Expired. Please contact your system administrator" for Windows XP Professional
I/O error reported on file system /oracle/P1U aix hdisk path vio
Can't access Exchange 2003 OWA from Internet
How to determine hard disk activities
How to trace a phone without installing the software?
Outlook Web App (OWA) 2010 defaults to light version for specific user
Mitel Teleworker One Way Audio
ftp put via php from linux to AS/400
Which Controller for 4 HD, RAID 1 mirrored drives?